🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could affect comparable debates in other member states